An interview with Gil Beyen, CEO of Tigenix NV
Regenerative medicine is gaining traction for treating damaged joints.
In recent years, regeneration technology has become an exciting area within orthopaedics. The interdisciplinary approach aims to repair damaged tissue and restore it to full function. With few manufacturers in the orthopaedics segment of biologics, one Belgian company is positioning itself to become a global leader in the field. Tigenix NV (Leuven), whose slogan is “regenerating motion,” focuses on joint mobility. Its lead technology, ChondroCelect, is intended for autologous knee cartilage repair. It provides an option for patients who are between following the wait-and-see approach and requiring knee replacement surgery.
ChondroCelect is also the first product to receive authorization by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) under the European Union’s advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) regulation. Armed with EMEA approval in June 2009, Tigenix is taking the next big step toward gathering data about the technology and preparing the pathway to regulatory approval in the United States.
Recently, OrthoTec’s editor Maria Fontanazza sat down with Gil Beyen, CEO of Tigenix, to discuss how the company is building its business through first-to-market technology and its 2010 strategy.
 |
Beyen
|
OrthoTec: How does Tigenix fit into the field of regenerative medicine?
Gil Beyen: Regenerative medicine is a new wave of medicine in which we combine cell technology, biomaterial technology, and growth factor technology to make biological implants or tissue-engineering constructs. Since January 2009, a new regulation has been implemented in Europe and all cell-based products are now under EMEA supervision, under the new ATMP regulation. The regulation says that all cell-based products need to be considered like biologics, which was already the case in the United States [where] cell-based products have been regulated by FDA since the mid-1990s.
In Europe, some companies took the approach that they could start selling products without being regulated. We took another approach—that although there was no regulation in the early 2000s, we expected it would come one day. We also knew that the field was already regulated in the United States. We started clinical trials [on ChondroCelect], although they were not really needed, and in the meantime, the regulation has come. So as a result of that strategic decision, we have the only product that has central approval in Europe. The other [products] are still allowed in the market but [they] will have to have obtain their marketing authorizations or phase out by the end of 2012. That is the transition period for the products that have not done the clinical trials.
ORT: How did the development of ChondroCelect evolve?
Beyen: We’ve been developing ChondroCelect over the past 10 years. The product is intended for repair of large cartilage lesions in the knee. By large lesions, we mean more than one or two square centimeters, and mainly full-thickness lesions where the cartilage has gone down to the underlying bone. Cartilage is a tissue that doesn’t regenerate spontaneously, and there’s not much of an alternative for patients who have these types of lesions today. To repair this cartilage in a durable way, the best technology is to take a little piece of cartilage, or biopsy, culture and harvest the cells, and bring the cells back to the patients after about four weeks. [The cells are] reimplanted into the defect, and the cells make new cartilage.
We have not invented this technique. It was developed more than 20 years ago in Sweden. What we have done with ChondroCelect is further refine the method and look at what the right cells are to make this durable and stable cartilage tissue. Frank Luyten, our scientific founder, has spent many years identifying the biological pathways that are important to make the good cartilage. He spent 12 years at the NIH [National Institutes of Health] in Bethesda [Maryland], doing research in this field. He found about 200 genes involved in the biological pathways that have an important role in maintaining the good cartilage phenotype. From that, we selected a small number to make a profile of the good cartilage cells and used that to optimize the whole cell culture product to become ChondroCelect. It is a cell-based product that is derived from a patient’s own cells to make durable cartilage tissue.
After a lot of preclinical work, we brought [the product] into clinical trials in 2002. We started a quite ambitious Phase III clinical trial that compared ChondroCelect to microfracture, [which is] currently the standard of care. Microfracture is a surgical intervention in which the surgeon punches or drills holes in the defect down to the bone to create bleeding. The bleeding will then induce repair tissue formation, fill the defect, and relieve the pain. It’s a way to relieve pain, but in many cases it’s not a durable regeneration of tissue. It’s still used as a standard of care, especially for the smaller defects.
The main clinical trial on which our approval was based compared ChondroCelect with microfracture in a randomized prospective setting. It was an ambitious trial that was designed as a drug trial and then applied to the cell product. What we have shown is structural superiority in the short term and clinical benefit over the long term. At 12 months, it was demonstrated that ChondroCelect led to a better quality of repair tissue than microfracture. At 36 months, the product showed continued improvement of clinical outcome as well as clinical benefit over microfracture—less pain, more function, and better quality of life with no unexpected safety issues. It was also seen that the clinical benefit was more pronounced when patients were treated early after the onset of their symptoms. Both [trial] results have been published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine. The 12-month results were published in 2008, and the three-year results were published in 2009.
Before our approval, we had treated about 500 patients in our clinical trials and a large compassionate use program.
ORT: What are the next plans for ChondroCelect?
Beyen: We’re prelaunching the product. [Our] focus is to obtain reimbursement, which is a process that can take from six months to more than a year in Europe. In Germany, we recently received special status as an innovative new treatment, which makes it eligible for reimbursement by the sickness funds.
In the meantime, we have built up commercial core teams. We’re doing the launch ourselves with about 15 people on the commercial team. We’re focusing on reference centers, so it’s not the type of product that you sell to the whole orthopaedics world. We train them and make sure they have knowledge of the product and handling of the product.
We’re making sure we’re getting reimbursement in the [key] countries. And although we don’t have reimbursement yet, we’re already treating patients as we speak, but [they are] mainly privately insured or workers-compensation patients. We’re launching the product in Germany, the United Kingdom, Benelux, Spain, and France. Coming to the United States is the next big step for us. We’ve been in contact with FDA and are discussing what the next steps will be to [begin the approval process in] the United States.
ORT: How has the acquisition of Orthomimetics enhanced Tigenix’s product line?
Beyen: We acquired Orthomimetics in November 2009. It’s a UK-based spinoff company of MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] and the University of Cambridge that is also active in regenerative medicine, but with a different approach. We were more focused on the cell as the active ingredient, and it was more interested in the collagen and biomaterials supports of regenerative medicine. This was complementary because regenerative medicine is also about combining cells and biomaterials, and we wanted to build a biomaterials platform. It also had a product that was approved, Chondromimetic, for the same point of sale but with a different indication. It is a collagen plug that can be used to repair small but deep cartilage lesions with concurrent damage to the underlying bone. The product is CE marked in Europe. The evidence that is being built in Europe will be used for the United States, but we still have to [seek approval] for this product in the United States. ChondroCelect is for large cartilage lesions, and Chondromimetic for small lesions where you have cartilage and subchondral bone damage.
ORT: What are the company’s short- and long-term plans for development?
Beyen: The three main strategic directions of the company are to make ChondroCelect and Chondromimetic successful in Europe, bring the products to the United States, and develop a pipeline of complementary products. We’re working toward optimizing the ChondroCelect product—for example, introducing a cryopreservation step to make it easier for planning the surgery. We’re also working on minimally invasive and arthroscopic delivery systems by using this collagen membrane in different ways.
 |
A vial of cultivated ChondroCelect cells is ready for transport.
|
In the short term, the closest to marketing in the third priority [with regards to developing a complementary product pipeline] is the [development of a] meniscus product. We’re working on a cell-based product for the repair of meniscal tears—where the meniscus is torn and where cells act like glue to bring the two pieces of the meniscus together. We’re hoping to bring that into an exploratory clinical trial by the end of this year or early next year.
The rest of the pipeline is building on the same theme. By combining our cell technology with the biomaterials, we are working on regenerative medicine products for the repair of other joint-related tissues such as ligaments, tendon, and bone.
ORT: How is competition affecting the company’s strategy in both Europe and the United States?
Beyen: In the field of specific cell-based products for cartilage repair, I think the real pioneer in this field, and our competition, is Genzyme. They have a strong position in the United States with the Carticel product, and in Europe with the Maci product.
In the United States, for the cell-based products, there’s very little competition. There are more companies in earlier stages of development. In Europe, the difference is that because there was no regulation, a number of companies started to sell products in the early 2000s. With the new regulation, we expect that not all of them will perform the clinical trials to obtain marketing authorization needed to remain in the market beyond 2012.
On the Orthomimetics product, there’s quite some competition in the collagen [field]. [What’s specific to] Orthomimetics is the combination of collagen with calcium phosphates and glucosamineglycans, and the ability to make multilayered scaffolds, which can create unique advantages in places where soft tissue has to connect to bone.
ORT: With the new regulation in Europe, are you expecting to see any increased competition?
Beyen: I think the consequence of this regulation will be a bit of a shake out initially, but there will be a stronger and more realistic industry emerging from this. I think it will be good for the field of regenerative medicine because more solid and more validated products will be the result. In Europe, it has been very difficult to raise money for the field of regenerative medicine, because it wasn’t really clear how you could develop a product, and there were no clear rules. The fact that there are now rules of the game means that the game can start.
ORT: What are your hopes for the field of regenerative medicine?
Beyen: If you look at the spectrum of treatments for cartilage damage today, you see a range of symptom-relieving products and treatment on the one end. At the other end of the spectrum, we have the replacement, the knee prosthesis. The problem is that there’s a big gap. The 45-year-old with a big cartilage lesion that painkillers don’t help anymore, and who is too young for total knee replacement, has very few treatment options today. For these patients, we need biological solutions. Regenerative medicine bridges the gap between symptom relief and replacements by bringing biological implants and biological solutions that can prevent the progression toward osteoarthritis, or at least delay it. I see it emerging as a new field of medicine—somewhere between the drug and the device. Today we’re probably the largest company in Europe in regenerative medicine. We’re focusing on capitalizing on this and building a leadership position in this emerging and exciting field.
Login or
register to post comments